BH Telecom ADSL, Moja TV i Mobile - oficijelni thread

ja nemam nikakvih problema (za sada)

Code:

Pinging google.com [172.217.18.78] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57
Reply from 172.217.18.78: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 172.217.18.78:
    Packets: Sent = 33, Received = 33, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 31ms

 

Sad opet gledam i izgleda da je problem u lokalnoj mrezi:

Code:

Pinging gw-hsi-bng-tz2.bih.net.ba [89.146.128.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=304ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=254
Reply from 89.146.128.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=254

edit: ok je sad

 

Ima li ista od smanjenja cijena ovih dodatnih paketa na mojatv?

Sent from my Redmi 5 Plus using Tapatalk

 

Bit ce sad za prvi valjda.

 

Ja im poslao mail i ne odgovaraju. Hocu odjaviti dodatni paket 1 i uzeti opciju 1.

Sent from my Redmi 5 Plus using Tapatalk

 

Sta je to opcija 1? Ja imam taj dodatni paket 1, trebao mi je malo veci upload, tako da sad imam 'skoro 2MBita', ali opet dajem 10km za to dzaba, lose su mi zice pa nemam bas kapaciteta za bolje...

 

Pa opcija 1 je dokup brzine za moja tv pakete, maximalni speed je 50/8Mbps.

Sent from my Redmi 5 Plus using Tapatalk

 

Daj bože da išta od ovoga bude ušutili su se.

1.10 je bio taj plan pa su pomjerili za 1.11.

Koliki vam je upload na mojatv full?

Ja ne izvlacim ni 100kb/s

Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using Tapatalk

 

Ovisno o udaljenosti od DSLAMa ja izvučem 40/2, a moglo bi 40/6Mbps. Nemam Full nego MojaTV net + paket 1.

Sent from my Redmi 5 Plus using Tapatalk

 

Kod mene 4.6 a moglo bi 40

 

Proradio 1.1.1.1 opet ako nekog zanima.

 

Cemu taj fazon 1 1 1 1

Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using Tapatalk

 

https://1.1.1.1/

Neki sajtovi bolje rade. Meni na telemahu recimo youtube brze radi, brze otvara klip. Kada kilkam po timelineu nema dugog loadinga itd.

 

Čemu kafetin kad boli glava, ničemu, ali eto svima "prođe" glavobolja. Placebo.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

Cuj nicemu

 

Najbrzi dns sto znaci da najbrze mozes otvarati web stranice:

https://www.dnsperf.com/

Takodjer ako radis sa web stranicama i pravis subdomains onda subdomain mozes otvorit u roku od 10 sekundi a ne cekat 24h ili sta vec.

 

Tacno je da je nesto brzi od onog google-ovog public 8.8.x.x, ali to je 30ms brze. Cisto da uporedim koliko je ovo zanemarivo je da smo do skoro koristili lcd monitore sa 15ms response time.

@exwizzard
Tacnije, ne otvaras brze stranice, vec prije dobijas ip adresu servera gdje je sajt hostan, i to nekog novog sajta kojeg dosad nisi posjetio jer naravno postoji i lokalni cache svih dns upita.

Vezano za nove domene, ako je cache kraci nego kod ostalih servera, to ce pomoci tebi da vidis svoj sajt, ali ne i drugima. Ako vec to zelis, mozes to odraditi i u svom hosts fajlu (i na linuxu i win).

Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using Tapatalk

 

Ja sam testirao po mjesec dana i nisam vidio nikakvu razliku.
1.1.1.1 zna pravit problem jer Cisco oprema koristi tu adresu interno i po defaultu Cisco oprema blokira saobraćaj prema toj adresi, al eto more se naklikat

 

Lik je pitao cemu fazon 1.1.1.1.

Mozes ti skroz izbacit dns iz mreze i manuelno dodavat domene u host file ako hoces lol, ali nije to fazon. Poenta je da sto vise ljudi pocne koristit 1.1.1.1 i onda svi smo sretniji.

edit: Meni licno npr web stranica se loada za 35ms bez lokalnog browser cacha, licno mi smeta npr da znam da neko tamo koristi neki random dns i onda pri prvom loadu mu treba 65ms+

 

Citao sam i ja o ovome kad sam razgovarao sa cloudflare support da pocnu podrzavat bosnu za 1.1.1.1 i mozes vidit da je BHTelecom na listi providera koji su se odazvali i rijesili problem:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/fixing-reachability-to-1-1-1-1-globally/

Sad ne kontam zasto bi nekad kasnije pokvarili to ali izgleda da je temporary problem bio. Trenutno koristim 1.1.1.1 kao sekundarni dns a 8.8.8.8 kao primarni jer nije jos "pouzdano".